Zodiac Stuff!
- Masteroftheweb
- Vagabond
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:35 pm
- Location: Earth, Sol, Milky
- Contact:
Kaos is a moderator...?
congradulations!
"and i mean religion based on the salvation of ones soul.. "
So anything that doesn't involve the saving of someone's souls isn't a religion? The way you word your sentances, it sounds as if christainity is the only religion that could possibly be right. Maybe you'll understand my low church comment a little better now.
congradulations!
"and i mean religion based on the salvation of ones soul.. "
So anything that doesn't involve the saving of someone's souls isn't a religion? The way you word your sentances, it sounds as if christainity is the only religion that could possibly be right. Maybe you'll understand my low church comment a little better now.
Last edited by Masteroftheweb on Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Oh dear, this has turned into a big pile of bickering.
My original point was, that people will believe in whatever they want to believe if it makes them feel better. If that (in it's wild generalisation) actually comes to some good then i don't think there is a problem with that.
I don't care if that is religion, the reading of tealeaves or making there bed to military perfection. It's up to them and there free will. I just ask that people respect the right of others in which to believe what they want with a certain amount of tolerance and understanding.
(Johnny i knew you where a mod ages ago lol... you've been a mod for about as long as Kestra chern was my usertitle.)
My original point was, that people will believe in whatever they want to believe if it makes them feel better. If that (in it's wild generalisation) actually comes to some good then i don't think there is a problem with that.
I don't care if that is religion, the reading of tealeaves or making there bed to military perfection. It's up to them and there free will. I just ask that people respect the right of others in which to believe what they want with a certain amount of tolerance and understanding.
(Johnny i knew you where a mod ages ago lol... you've been a mod for about as long as Kestra chern was my usertitle.)
- Super Goat Weed
- Anti-Hero
- Posts: 3407
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:13 pm
- Masteroftheweb
- Vagabond
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:35 pm
- Location: Earth, Sol, Milky
- Contact:
- Masteroftheweb
- Vagabond
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:35 pm
- Location: Earth, Sol, Milky
- Contact:
- Super Goat Weed
- Anti-Hero
- Posts: 3407
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:13 pm
- Super Goat Weed
- Anti-Hero
- Posts: 3407
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:13 pm
although i will admit Matt was far FAR worse then you. Maybe it's not exactly fair to group the two of you togeather in that.Bogey wrote:The first person to ask a question in the Q & A session I would call a retard, or just a complete dick.
Last edited by Super Goat Weed on Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hahahahahahaha, is that because of his religious belief?
Did you actually watch the video? The reason I call him a retard and insult him is the way he acts. It's extremely childish. Firstly he comes on mimicing what Dawkins did at the beginning of the lecture saying "Is this mic on?" to mock him. Then when Dawkins asks him to speak up because he can't hear him, he does a long drawn out sarcastic "ssuuuuurrrrreeeee" and follows up with talking to Dawkins like a retard.
Seriously Ben, misquote me on something else. It's funny.
EDIT: It's also clear that you either did not read or understand Matt's explanation on using the term "religious retards". He was talking about the fanatics in the videos.
Did you actually watch the video? The reason I call him a retard and insult him is the way he acts. It's extremely childish. Firstly he comes on mimicing what Dawkins did at the beginning of the lecture saying "Is this mic on?" to mock him. Then when Dawkins asks him to speak up because he can't hear him, he does a long drawn out sarcastic "ssuuuuurrrrreeeee" and follows up with talking to Dawkins like a retard.
Seriously Ben, misquote me on something else. It's funny.
EDIT: It's also clear that you either did not read or understand Matt's explanation on using the term "religious retards". He was talking about the fanatics in the videos.
Last edited by Bogey on Wed Nov 29, 2006 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Super Goat Weed
- Anti-Hero
- Posts: 3407
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:13 pm
no, perhaps i misunderstood the fact that you were talking about his mannerisims rather then his questions, and if that's the case i apologise. I would say he was a bit juvanile, but then again, so is that whole video. It's full of insults and sarcastic biting humor. It's not really suprising that someone would want to tell him off.
And those 'fanatics' in the video are simply people that believe differently then you do. That hardly justifies you to insult them. I'm sure if Matt were to meet several of my friends, he would consider them to be 'fanatics' and 'retards.' I find that very insulting and horribly hypocritical.
And those 'fanatics' in the video are simply people that believe differently then you do. That hardly justifies you to insult them. I'm sure if Matt were to meet several of my friends, he would consider them to be 'fanatics' and 'retards.' I find that very insulting and horribly hypocritical.